Persistent Identifier
|
doi:10.7910/DVN/CWVQTZ |
Publication Date
|
2025-02-28 |
Title
| Replication Data for: Measuring Electoral Democracy with Observables |
Author
| Weitzel, DanielColorado State UniversityORCID0000-0003-1431-2542
John GerringUniversity of Texas at AustinORCID0000-0001-9858-2050
Daniel PemsteinNorth Dakota State UniversityORCID0000-0002-1144-6337
Svend-Erik SkaaningAarhus UniversityORCID0000-0002-8587-8183 |
Point of Contact
|
Use email button above to contact.
Daniel Weitzel (Colorado State University) |
Description
| Most crossnational indices of democracy rely centrally on coder judgments, which are susceptible to personal bias and error, and also require expensive and time-consuming coding by experts. The few measures based exclusively on observable indicators are either dichotomous or rely on a few rather crude proxies. This project lays out an approach to measurement based on observables that aims to preserve the nuanced quality of subjectively coded democracy indices. First, we gather data for a wide range of observable indicators, X´, that capture different aspects of the democratic process. Next, we use supervised random forest machine learning to predict Z using factual indicators, X´, creating an observable-to-subjective score mapping (OSM). The mapping that provides the best cross-validated fit to the outcome serves as an alternate index, Z´, for that conceptualization of democracy. Information loss from Z to Z´ is minimal for indices centered on an electoral conception of democracy and this loss may be advantageous for some purposes. It is free of idiosyncratic coder errors arising from misinformation, slack, or biases for or against a regime. It is also less susceptible to systematic bias that may arise from coders’ inferences about a country’s regime status, e.g., from the ideology of the current ruler. The data collection procedure and mode of analysis is fully transparent and replicable, and the procedure is cheap to produce, easy to update, and offers coverage for all polities with sovereign or semisovereign status, surpassing the sample of any existing index. We show that this expansive coverage makes a big difference to our understanding of some causal questions. (2024-01-08) |
Subject
| Social Sciences |
Keyword
| democracy
democratization
backsliding |
Notes
| This dataset underwent an independent verification process, complying with the AJPS Verification Policy updated June 2023, which replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of the code. The verification process was carried out by the Cornell Center for Social Sciences at Cornell University.
The associated article has been awarded the Open Materials Badge. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.
Open Materials Badge |
Producer
| Daniel Weitzel (Colorado State University)
John Gerring (University of Texas at Austin)
Daniel Pemstein (North Dakota State University)
Svend-Erik Skaaning (Aarhus University) |
Depositor
| Weitzel, Daniel |
Deposit Date
| 2024-01-08 |
Data Source
| Bolt, Jutta, and Jan Luiten Van Zanden. "Maddison‐style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update." Journal of Economic Surveys (2020).
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Fabio Angiolillo, Michael Bernhard, Cecilia Borella, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Linnea Fox, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Ana Good God, Sandra Grahn, Allen Hicken, Katrin Kinzelbach, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Anja Neundorf, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Oskar Rydén, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2024. "V-Dem Codebook v14" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
Gerring, John, Brendan Apfeld, Tore Wig, and Andreas Forø Tollefsen. The Deep Roots of Modern Democracy: Geography and the Diffusion of Political Institutions. Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Gründler and Krieger (2016). Democracy and growth: Evidence from a Machine Learning indicator. European Journal of Political Economy, 45(1), 85-107.
Gründler and Krieger (2019). Should we care (more) about data aggregation? Evidence from Democracy Indices. CESifo Working Paper 7480.
Herre, Bastian. 2023. Identifying Ideologues: A Global Dataset on Political Leaders, 1945- 2020. British Journal of Political Science 53(2): 740-748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000217
Porta, Rafael La, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. "Law and finance." Journal of political economy 106, no. 6 (1998): 1113-1155.
Skaaning, Svend-Erik, John Gerring, and Henrikas Bartusevičius. "A lexical index of electoral democracy." Comparative Political Studies 48.12 (2015): 1491-1525.
Teorell, Jan, Aksel Sundström, Sören Holmberg, Bo Rothstein, Natalia Alvarado Pachon, Cem Mert Dalli, Rafael Lopez Valverde & Paula Nilsson. 2024. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan24. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government doi:10.18157/qogstdjan24 |