View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
Citation |
|
---|---|
Title: |
Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19 |
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U |
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
Date of Distribution: |
2021-01-25 |
Version: |
2 |
Bibliographic Citation: |
Case, Chandler; Eddy, Christopher; Hemrajani, Rahul; Howell, Christopher; Lyons, Daniel; Sung, Yu-Hsien; Connors, Elizabeth, 2021, "Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U, Harvard Dataverse, V2 |
Citation |
|
Title: |
Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19 |
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U |
Authoring Entity: |
Case, Chandler (University of South Carolina) |
Eddy, Christopher (University of South Carolina) |
|
Hemrajani, Rahul (University of South Carolina) |
|
Howell, Christopher (University of South Carolina) |
|
Lyons, Daniel (University of South Carolina) |
|
Sung, Yu-Hsien (University of South Carolina) |
|
Connors, Elizabeth (University of South Carolina) |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
Access Authority: |
Connors, Elizabeth |
Depositor: |
Connors, Elizabeth |
Date of Deposit: |
2021-01-22 |
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U |
Study Scope |
|
Keywords: |
Social Sciences, Public Opinion, Survey Experiment, Political Persuasion |
Abstract: |
The health and economic outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic will in part be determined by how effectively experts can communicate information to the public and the degree to which people follow expert recommendation. Using a survey experiment conducted in May of 2020 with almost 5,000 respondents, this paper examines the effect of source cues and message frames on perceptions of information credibility in the context of COVID-19. Each health recommendation was framed by expert or non-expert sources, was fact- or experience-based, and suggested potential gain or loss to test if either the source cue or framing of issues affected responses to the pandemic. We find no evidence that either source cue or message framing influence people's responses—instead, respondents’ ideological predispositions, media consumption, and age explain much of the variation in survey responses, suggesting that public health messaging may face challenges from growing ideological cleavages in American politics. |
Notes: |
The shared data have been deidentified. |
Methodology and Processing |
|
Sources Statement |
|
Data Access |
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
Label: |
data_version_2.xlsx |
Notes: |
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
Label: |
readme.txt |
Text: |
Readme file for data analysis |
Notes: |
text/plain |
Label: |
replication_code_version_2.R |
Notes: |
type/x-r-syntax |