Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19 (doi:10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2021-01-25

Version:

2

Bibliographic Citation:

Case, Chandler; Eddy, Christopher; Hemrajani, Rahul; Howell, Christopher; Lyons, Daniel; Sung, Yu-Hsien; Connors, Elizabeth, 2021, "Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U, Harvard Dataverse, V2

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U

Authoring Entity:

Case, Chandler (University of South Carolina)

Eddy, Christopher (University of South Carolina)

Hemrajani, Rahul (University of South Carolina)

Howell, Christopher (University of South Carolina)

Lyons, Daniel (University of South Carolina)

Sung, Yu-Hsien (University of South Carolina)

Connors, Elizabeth (University of South Carolina)

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Connors, Elizabeth

Depositor:

Connors, Elizabeth

Date of Deposit:

2021-01-22

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0Q1F1U

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Public Opinion, Survey Experiment, Political Persuasion

Abstract:

The health and economic outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic will in part be determined by how effectively experts can communicate information to the public and the degree to which people follow expert recommendation. Using a survey experiment conducted in May of 2020 with almost 5,000 respondents, this paper examines the effect of source cues and message frames on perceptions of information credibility in the context of COVID-19. Each health recommendation was framed by expert or non-expert sources, was fact- or experience-based, and suggested potential gain or loss to test if either the source cue or framing of issues affected responses to the pandemic. We find no evidence that either source cue or message framing influence people's responses—instead, respondents’ ideological predispositions, media consumption, and age explain much of the variation in survey responses, suggesting that public health messaging may face challenges from growing ideological cleavages in American politics.

Notes:

The shared data have been deidentified.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

data_version_2.xlsx

Notes:

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

readme.txt

Text:

Readme file for data analysis

Notes:

text/plain

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

replication_code_version_2.R

Notes:

type/x-r-syntax