Replication data for: The Search for Comparability: Response to Binder (doi:10.7910/DVN/1DLOE6)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: The Search for Comparability: Response to Binder

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/1DLOE6

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2010-02-24

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Fang-Yi Chiou; Lawrence S. Rothenberg, 2010, "Replication data for: The Search for Comparability: Response to Binder", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1DLOE6, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: The Search for Comparability: Response to Binder

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/1DLOE6

Authoring Entity:

Fang-Yi Chiou (Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica)

Lawrence S. Rothenberg (University of Rochester)

Producer:

Political Analysis

Date of Production:

2008

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Distributor:

Murray Research Archive

Date of Deposit:

2010-02-24

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1DLOE6

Study Scope

Abstract:

Binder (n.d., Taking the measure of Congress: Reply to Chiou and Rothenberg. Political Analysis. Forthcoming) highlights areas of agreement and disagreement with our discussion of preference measurement and legislative gridlock. We now both agree that W-NOMINATE scores—employed in Binder (1999, The dynamics of legislative gridlock. American Political Science Review 9:519–33) to measure key independent variables, including bicameral differences—should not be used when examining multichamber legislatures over time. We continue to disagree over whether Common Space scores or Binder's conference vote measure is superior. In this response, we show that, although several of the theoretical and statistical objections that Binder (n.d.) raises to our Common Space measure do not apply, they are all relevant for her conference vote analog. Additionally, we detail how, despite protests to the contrary, the conference vote measure is plagued by insufficient data. Finally, we demonstrate how new efforts to show that Binder's (1999) results continue to hold are not robust.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Fang-Yi Chiou and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 2008. "Comparing Legislators and Legislatures: The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock Reconsidered." Political Analysis, 16(1), 226-233. <a href= "http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/16/2/226" target= "_new">subscribe to Political Analysis to access the full article</a>

Bibliographic Citation:

Fang-Yi Chiou and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 2008. "Comparing Legislators and Legislatures: The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock Reconsidered." Political Analysis, 16(1), 226-233. <a href= "http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/16/2/226" target= "_new">subscribe to Political Analysis to access the full article</a>

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

PA16-1_Chiou.pdf

Text:

Notes:

application/pdf