Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review (doi:10.7910/DVN/23752)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/23752

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2014-01-08

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh; Singh, Ravi Gopal; Mahajan, Gulshan, 2014, "Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/23752, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/23752

Authoring Entity:

Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh (IRRI-CESD)

Singh, Ravi Gopal (Bihar Agricultural University)

Mahajan, Gulshan (Punjab Agricultural University)

Date of Production:

2011

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Distributor:

Crop Protection

Access Authority:

Bhagirath Singh Chauhan

Depositor:

Jean Sabado

Date of Deposit:

2013-12-05

Date of Distribution:

2012

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/23752

Study Scope

Keywords:

Weed management, Weed ecology, Zero-till, Residue, Crop rotation, Intercropping

Abstract:

Tillage has been known to cause soil erosion and cost time and resources and this affects productivity and inflates the cost of production. Therefore, over the past few years in many countries, there has been a growing trend toward conservation agriculture (CA) to enhance sustainability without compromising land productivity. Three important pillars of CA are minimal tillage operations, permanent residue cover, and rotation of primary crops. Adoption of CA, however, influences weed populations differently from conventional agriculture. Weed control in CA is a greater challenge than in conventional agriculture because there is no weed seed burial by tillage operations and soil-applied herbicides are not incorporated, resulting in reduced efficacy. The behavior of weeds and their interaction with crops under CA tend to be complex and not fully understood. A large proportion of weed seed bank remains generally on or close to the soil surface after crop sowing under CA. Weed species, in which germination is stimulated by light, are likely to be more problematic in CA. In addition, in the absence of tillage, perennial weeds may also become more challenging in this system. On the other hand, weed seeds present on the soil surface are more prone to desiccation and greater predation activity of insects, especially ants. Crop residues, when uniformly and densely present, under CA could suppress weed seedling emergence, delay the time of emergence, and allow the crop to gain an initial advantage in terms of early vigor over weeds. Where pre-emergence herbicides are applied, crop residues may also intercept a considerable proportion of the applied herbicide and may result in lower herbicide efficacy. Approaches such as stale seedbed practice , uniform and dense crop establishment, use of cover crops and crop residues as mulch, crop rotations, and practices for enhanced crop competiveness with a combination of pre- and post-emergence herbicides could be integrated to develop sustainable and effective weed management strategies under CA systems.

Country:

Philippines

Notes:

Subject: null Type: CESD Notes: ;

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

2012_Chauhan,BS_Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture a review.pdf

Text:

Notes:

application/pdf