Replication data for: Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues? (doi:10.7910/DVN/26544)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

(external link)

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues?

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/26544

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2014-06-19

Version:

2

Bibliographic Citation:

Glynn, Adam N.; Sen, Maya, 2014, "Replication data for: Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues?", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26544, Harvard Dataverse, V2

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues?

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/26544

Authoring Entity:

Glynn, Adam N. (Harvard University)

Sen, Maya (University of Rochester)

Producer:

Sen, Maya

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Maya Sen

Depositor:

Maya Sen

Date of Deposit:

2014-06-19

Date of Distribution:

2014

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26544

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Judges

Abstract:

In this article, we consider whether personal relationships can affect the way that judges decide cases. To do so, we leverage the natural experiment of a child's gender to identify the effect of having daughters on the votes of judges. Using new data on the family lives of U.S. Courts of Appeals judges, we find that, conditional on the number of children a judge has, judges with daughters consistently vote in a more feminist fashion on gender issues than judges who have only sons. This result survives a number of robustness tests and appears to be driven primarily by Republican judges. More broadly, this result demonstrates that personal experiences influence how judges make decisions, and this is the first article to show that empathy may indeed be a component in how judges decide cases

Time Period:

1996-2002

Date of Collection:

2008-2014

Country:

United States

Universe:

U.S. Court of Appeals judges

Kind of Data:

Family data on U.S. Court of Appeals judges who decided cases between 1996-2012. Data includes case rulings on cases having a gender dimension, including cases involving discrimination against women on the basis of gender, discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, abortion, and Title IX.

Notes:

Version Date: nullVersion Text: 1

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Glynn, Adam N., and Maya Sen. 2015. “Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?”<i> American Journal of Political Science</i> 59 (1): 37–54.

Identification Number:

10.1111/ajps.12118

Bibliographic Citation:

Glynn, Adam N., and Maya Sen. 2015. “Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?”<i> American Journal of Political Science</i> 59 (1): 37–54.

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

glynn_sen_daughters_by_case_1.csv

Text:

Case-level data

Notes:

text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

glynn_sen_daughters_by_judge.csv

Text:

Judge-level data

Notes:

text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

glynn_sen_daughters_replication_code.R

Text:

R replication code

Notes:

text/plain; charset=US-ASCII