Replication data for: Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference (doi:10.7910/DVN/26642)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

(external link)

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/26642

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2014-07-08

Version:

2

Bibliographic Citation:

Glynn, Adam N.; Ichino, Nahomi, 2014, "Replication data for: Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26642, Harvard Dataverse, V2

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/26642

Authoring Entity:

Glynn, Adam N. (Emory University)

Ichino, Nahomi (University of Michigan)

Producer:

Adam N. Glynn

Nahomi Ichino

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Nahomi Ichino

Depositor:

Nahomi Ichino

Date of Deposit:

2014-07-04

Date of Distribution:

2014-07

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26642

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Causal inference, Electoral rules, Randomization inference, Africa, Mixed methods

Abstract:

Using the Rosenbaum (2002; 2009) approach to observational studies, we show how qualitative information can be incorporated into quantitative analyses to improve causal inference in three ways. First, by including qualitative information on outcomes within matched sets, we can ameliorate the consequences of the difficulty of measuring those outcomes, sometimes reducing p-values. Second, additional information across matched sets enables the construction of qualitative confidence intervals on effect size. Third, qualitative information on unmeasured confounders within matched sets reduces the conservativeness of Rosenbaum-style sensitivity analysis. This approach accommodates small to medium sample sizes in a non- parametric framework, and therefore may be particularly useful for analyses of the effects of policies or institutions in a given set of units. We illustrate these methods by examining the effect of using plurality rules in transitional presidential elections on opposition harassment in 1990s sub-Saharan Africa.

Time Period:

1991-1996

Geographic Coverage:

sub-Saharan Africa

Geographic Unit(s):

country

Kind of Data:

Country-level political and economic data

Notes:

Version Date: 2014Version Text: 1

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Glynn, Adam N., and Nahomi Ichino. 2015. “Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference.” <i>American Journal of Political Science</i> 59 (4): 1055-1071.

Identification Number:

10.1111/ajps.12154

Bibliographic Citation:

Glynn, Adam N., and Nahomi Ichino. 2015. “Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference.” <i>American Journal of Political Science</i> 59 (4): 1055-1071.

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Africa_qualCI.csv

Text:

Replication data for Africa example in Glynn and Ichino (2014)

Notes:

text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

GlynnIchino_qualCI_replicationcode.R

Text:

Replication code for Glynn and Ichino (2014)

Notes:

text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Glynn_Ichino_SI_qualinfo_20140703.pdf

Text:

Supplementary Information for Glynn and Ichino (2014), contains variable descriptions

Notes:

application/pdf