Replication Data for: Equivalency Framing of Problems and Policy Solutions (doi:10.7910/DVN/2VGIIW)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Equivalency Framing of Problems and Policy Solutions

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/2VGIIW

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2025-01-30

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Sahn, Alexander; Stoker, Laura; Lerman, Amy, 2025, "Replication Data for: Equivalency Framing of Problems and Policy Solutions", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/2VGIIW, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Equivalency Framing of Problems and Policy Solutions

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/2VGIIW

Authoring Entity:

Sahn, Alexander (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Stoker, Laura (UC Berkeley)

Lerman, Amy (UC Berkeley)

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Sahn, Alexander

Depositor:

Sahn, Alexander

Date of Deposit:

2025-01-14

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/2VGIIW

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences

Abstract:

While there is a large political science literature on framing effects, almost none of it has focused on equivalency framing of actual problems and potential solutions. We investigate whether the public expresses more concern about societal problems when logically equivalent information concerning their prevalence is framed in negative rather than in positive terms, and whether support for ameliorative policies changes when policies are framed as reducing the incidence of bad outcomes as opposed to increasing the incidence of good ones. From experiments covering a diverse set of issues, we find that equivalency frames have a consistent effect on the public’s evaluation of social problems: negative frames provoke substantially more negative emotional reactions to problems and lead to judgments that the problems are more serious and deserving of government attention. At the same time, we find no differences in support for gain-framed versus loss-framed policies designed to ameliorate these problems.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

data_amerispeak.csv

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

data_pilot_policy.csv

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

data_pilot_problem.csv

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

sahn_stoker_lerman_replication.R

Notes:

type/x-r-syntax