Replication data for: Strategic Voting in the 1994 Taipei City Mayoral Election (doi:10.7910/DVN/5QSIL6)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Strategic Voting in the 1994 Taipei City Mayoral Election

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/5QSIL6

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2008-12-16

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Philip O. Paolino; John Hsieh; Emerson Niou, 2008, "Replication data for: Strategic Voting in the 1994 Taipei City Mayoral Election", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5QSIL6, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Strategic Voting in the 1994 Taipei City Mayoral Election

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/5QSIL6

Authoring Entity:

Philip O. Paolino (University of North Texas)

John Hsieh (National Chengchi University)

Emerson Niou (Duke University)

Date of Production:

1997

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Distributor:

Philip O. Paolino

Date of Deposit:

2007-07

Date of Distribution:

2007

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5QSIL6

Study Scope

Keywords:

strategic voting; sincere voting; plurality rule; Condorcet winner; Borda winner; coordinating signal

Abstract:

In most multi-candidate, plurality rule elections, voters often have to consider whether or not to vote strategically; defecting from a most preferred, but non-viable candidate in order to reduce the chances that an even less-preferred candidate would be elected. What makes the 1994 Taipei election interesting is that the non-viable candidates could not be easily identified, which created an opportunity for party elites to manipulate voters' decisions by sending signals to influence their perceptions of the candidates' viability. Our analysis has two important results. First, voters discounted strategic considerations in their vote calculations early in the campaign, especially when there was considerable doubt, among both voters and party elites, over which candidate was unlikely to win the election. Second, once the election became more proximate and information about candidate viability was more likely to accurately reflect the outcome of the election, voters used signals from party elites and placed greater weight on strategic considerations.

Time Period:

1994-

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Paolino, Philip. "Strategic Voting in the 1994 Taipei City Mayoral Election," with John Hsieh and Emerson Niou. Electoral Studies. June 1997. Word for Windows 6.0 file. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00001-2. <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/02613794/1997/00000016/00000002/art00001" target= "_new"> article found here </a>

Bibliographic Citation:

Paolino, Philip. "Strategic Voting in the 1994 Taipei City Mayoral Election," with John Hsieh and Emerson Niou. Electoral Studies. June 1997. Word for Windows 6.0 file. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00001-2. <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/02613794/1997/00000016/00000002/art00001" target= "_new"> article found here </a>

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

mayor.doc

Text:

File containing the paper and tables for this study

Notes:

application/msword

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

mayor.zip

Text:

Zip file containing the mayor.doc file

Notes:

application/x-zip-compressed