Replication Data for: The Rule of Discourse: How Ideas and Discourses Shape China’s Zero-COVID Policy (doi:10.7910/DVN/6BNEXC)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: The Rule of Discourse: How Ideas and Discourses Shape China’s Zero-COVID Policy

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/6BNEXC

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2024-04-14

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Zhao, Zijing; Zhang, Kaiping, 2024, "Replication Data for: The Rule of Discourse: How Ideas and Discourses Shape China’s Zero-COVID Policy", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6BNEXC, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: The Rule of Discourse: How Ideas and Discourses Shape China’s Zero-COVID Policy

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/6BNEXC

Authoring Entity:

Zhao, Zijing (Tsinghua University)

Zhang, Kaiping (Tsinghua University)

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Zhao, Zijing

Depositor:

Zhao, Zijing

Date of Deposit:

2024-04-13

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6BNEXC

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Ideas, Political Discourse, Discursive Institutionalism, China, COVID-19 policy

Abstract:

Replication Data for: The Rule of Discourse: How Ideas and Discourses Shape China’s Zero-COVID Policy. Abstract: How can a controversial policy be effectively implemented and sustained over an extended period? We study this research question from the perspective of discursive institutionalism, using China’s zero-COVID policy as a case. We develop a typology that depicts China’s discursive engineering project featuring a multifaceted and adaptable nature. By analyzing Weibo posts published by Chinese state-led media accounts, we identify four types of political discourse that have prevailed: ideological, imperative, directive, and communicative discourse. The analysis from topic modeling and error correction models highlights the roles of both imperative and directive discourse in China’s COVID-19 policy, while the imperative discourse strengthened the control policy consistently across regions. This paper also sheds light on the mechanism by which the political discourse signals of the party-state reach mid-level bureaucrats, especially in the context of a public health crisis where the rule of law is further weakened.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

error correction model.do

Notes:

application/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Instructions on replication of the paper.docx

Text:

Please read me first.

Notes:

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

lm_merge_week_0302_manual_threshold.csv

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

replication_load_data.rdata

Notes:

application/x-rlang-transport

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

replication_load_data.Rmd

Notes:

text/x-r-notebook

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

replication_result.rdata

Notes:

application/x-rlang-transport