Replication Data for: Making Sense of Voting “Habits”: Applying the Process Model of Behavior Change to a Series of Large-Scale Get-Out-the-Vote Experiments (doi:10.7910/DVN/G07AO1)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Making Sense of Voting “Habits”: Applying the Process Model of Behavior Change to a Series of Large-Scale Get-Out-the-Vote Experiments

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/G07AO1

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2023-04-05

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Ternovski, John, 2023, "Replication Data for: Making Sense of Voting “Habits”: Applying the Process Model of Behavior Change to a Series of Large-Scale Get-Out-the-Vote Experiments", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/G07AO1, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Making Sense of Voting “Habits”: Applying the Process Model of Behavior Change to a Series of Large-Scale Get-Out-the-Vote Experiments

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/G07AO1

Authoring Entity:

Ternovski, John (US Air Force Academy)

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Ternovski, John

Depositor:

Ternovski, John

Date of Deposit:

2023-04-05

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/G07AO1

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, turnout persistence, experiment, habit

Abstract:

I apply a new theoretical framework to voting to more cohesively bridge the economic cost-benefit model of voting with the psychology-motivated voting-as-a-habit literature. This new theoretical frame gives greater clarity as to how a vote in one election might beget a vote in another election, while yielding testable predictions as to which circumstances are more favorable for developing turnout persistence. To test these predictions, I make use of a novel dataset consisting of nine large-N, door-to-door voter mobilization field experiments in various election contexts (with ~1.8 million voters in total). Consistent with prior empirical research, my analysis finds that being nudged to vote in one election leads to increased turnout four years later. But the main contribution of this paper is that the theoretical framework’s predictions and the corresponding empirical results make sense of turnout persistence heterogeneities that have been detected in certain prior empirical studies but not others.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

1_analysis.do

Text:

Stata code for all analysis conducted in the paper.

Notes:

application/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

analysis_file.dta

Text:

Data file with synthetic variables (generated as part of 1_analysis.do).

Notes:

application/x-stata-14

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

downstream_turnout_full.dta

Text:

Source data file (without synthetic variables).

Notes:

application/x-stata-14

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

log.txt

Text:

A file showing the full output of running 1_analysis.do in Stata.

Notes:

text/plain

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

README.txt

Text:

A readme file describing the replication files.

Notes:

text/plain