Replication data for: Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge (doi:10.7910/DVN/GMZM4D)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

(external link)

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/GMZM4D

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2012-07-27

Version:

2

Bibliographic Citation:

Dancey, Logan; Sheagley, Geoffrey, 2012, "Replication data for: Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GMZM4D, Harvard Dataverse, V2

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication data for: Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/GMZM4D

Authoring Entity:

Dancey, Logan (Wesleyan University)

Sheagley, Geoffrey (University of Minnesota)

Producer:

Logan Dancey

Geoffrey Sheagley

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Geoff Sheagley

Depositor:

Logan Dancey

Date of Deposit:

2012-07-02

Date of Distribution:

2012

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GMZM4D

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Political knowledge, Heuristic, Misinformation, Party cues

Abstract:

Party cues provide citizens with low-cost information about their representatives’ policy positions. But what happens when elected officials deviate from the party line? Relying on the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we examine citizens’ knowledge of their senators’ positions on seven high-profile roll call votes. We find that although politically-interested citizens are the group most likely to know their senator’s position when she votes with the party, they are also the group most likely to incorrectly identify their senator’s position when she votes against her party. The results indicate that when heuristics “go bad” it is the norm for the most attentive segment of the public to become the most misinformed, revealing an important drawback to heuristic use.

Time Period:

2006-2006

Country:

United States

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Related Materials

This article uses data from the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, which can be found at: http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cces/

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Dancey, Logan, and Geoffrey Sheagley. 2013. “Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge.” <i>American Journal of Political Science</i> 57 (2): 312–25.

Identification Number:

10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00621.x

Bibliographic Citation:

Dancey, Logan, and Geoffrey Sheagley. 2013. “Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge.” <i>American Journal of Political Science</i> 57 (2): 312–25.

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Replication - Data Formatting.do

Text:

Use this file to format data.

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Replication - Models.do

Text:

Use this file to replicate models in the paper and SI.

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Replication - SUEST.do

Text:

Use this file to test significance of coefficients across models.

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax; charset=US-ASCII

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Replication - WSWS.do

Text:

Use this file to replicate WS/WS analyses found in supporting information.

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax; charset=US-ASCII