Replication Data for: The Limits (and Strengths) of Single-Topic Experiments (doi:10.7910/DVN/QX0BSK)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: The Limits (and Strengths) of Single-Topic Experiments

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/QX0BSK

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2024-09-07

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Rainey, Carlisle, 2024, "Replication Data for: The Limits (and Strengths) of Single-Topic Experiments", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QX0BSK, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: The Limits (and Strengths) of Single-Topic Experiments

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/QX0BSK

Authoring Entity:

Rainey, Carlisle (Florida State University)

Producer:

<i>Political Analysis</i>

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Rainey, Carlisle

Depositor:

Rainey, Carlisle

Date of Deposit:

2024-04-24

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QX0BSK

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences

Abstract:

Abstract: We examine the generalizability of single-topic studies, focusing on how often their confidence intervals capture the typical treatment effect from a larger population of possible studies. We show that the confidence intervals from these single-topic studies capture the typical effect from a population of topics at well below the nominal rate. For a plausible scenario, the confidence interval from a single-topic study might only be half as wide as an interval that captures the typical effect at the nominal rate. We highlight three important conclusions. First, we emphasize that researchers and readers must take care when generalizing the inferences from single-topic studies to a larger population of possible studies. Second, we demonstrate the critical importance of similarity across topics in drawing inferences and encourage researchers to consider designs that explicitly estimate and leverage similarity. Third, we emphasize that, despite their limitations, single-topic experiments have some important advantages.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Forthcoming, Political Analysis Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/zaykd

Identification Number:

add DOI# here when available. If not available, please delete all text in this field before saving

Bibliographic Citation:

Forthcoming, Political Analysis Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/zaykd

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

install-packages.R

Text:

Notes:

type/x-r-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

limits.Rproj

Text:

Notes:

application/octet-stream

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

make-figures.R

Text:

Notes:

type/x-r-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

master.R

Text:

Notes:

type/x-r-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

README.pdf

Text:

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure1.png

Text:

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure2.png

Text:

Notes:

image/png