Replication Data for: Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions (doi:10.7910/DVN/TVJCTX)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/TVJCTX

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2022-10-11

Version:

2

Bibliographic Citation:

Hill, Seth J.; Roberts, Margaret E., 2022, "Replication Data for: Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TVJCTX, Harvard Dataverse, V2

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/TVJCTX

Authoring Entity:

Hill, Seth J. (UCSD)

Roberts, Margaret E. (UCSD)

Producer:

Political Analysis

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Hill, Seth J.

Depositor:

Hill, Seth J.

Date of Deposit:

2022-09-23

Series Name:

Volume #, Issue #

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TVJCTX

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Political beliefs, misperceptions, rumors and conspiracies, acquiescence-response bias, survey methodology

Abstract:

Scholars, pundits, and politicians use opinion surveys to study citizen beliefs about political facts, such as the current unemployment rate, and more conspiratorial beliefs, such as whether Barack Obama was born abroad. Many studies, however, ignore acquiescence-response bias, the tendency for survey respondents to endorse any assertion made in a survey question regardless of content. With new surveys fielding questions asked in recent scholarship, we show that acquiescence bias inflates estimated incidence of conspiratorial beliefs and political misperceptions in the U.S. and China by up to 50%. Acquiescence bias is disproportionately prevalent among more ideological respondents, inflating correlations between political ideology such as conservatism and endorsement of conspiracies or misperception of facts. We propose and demonstrate two methods to correct for acquiescence bias.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Select one option from below, remove everything else: Forthcoming, Political Analysis

Bibliographic Citation:

Select one option from below, remove everything else: Forthcoming, Political Analysis

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

HillRobertsRepArchive.zip

Notes:

application/zip