|
View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
|
Citation |
|
|---|---|
|
Title: |
Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Date of Distribution: |
2009-01-21 |
|
Version: |
1 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN, Harvard Dataverse, V1 |
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN |
|
Authoring Entity: |
Brian Nosek (University of Virginia) |
|
Producer: |
Brian Nosek |
|
Date of Production: |
2007 |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Distributor: |
Brian Nosek |
|
Distributor: |
Murray Research Archive |
|
Access Authority: |
Brian Nosek |
|
Date of Deposit: |
2008-02-18 |
|
Date of Distribution: |
2008-02-18 |
|
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN |
|
Study Scope |
|
|
Keywords: |
implicit social cognition |
|
Abstract: |
Recent theoretical and methodological innovations suggest a distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. We applied Campbell and Fiske’s (1959) classic multitrait-multimethod design precepts to test the construct validity of implicit attitudes as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Participants (N = 287) were measured on both self-report and IAT for up to seven attitude domains. Through a sequence of latent-variable structural models, systematic method variance was distinguished from attitude variance, and a correlated two-factors-per-attitude model (implicit and explicit factors) was superior to a single-factor-per-attitude specification. That is, despite sometimes strong relations between implicit and explicit attitude factors, collapsing their indicators into a single attitude factor resulted in relatively inferior model fit.We conclude that these implicit and explicit measures assess related but distinct attitude constructs. This provides a basis for, but does not distinguish between, dual-process and dual-representation theories that account for the distinctions between constructs. |
|
Time Period: |
2000-09-2001-06 |
|
Date of Collection: |
2000-09-2001-06 |
|
Country: |
United States |
|
Geographic Coverage: |
New Haven, CT |
|
Geographic Unit(s): |
New Haven, CT |
|
Notes: |
Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.; |
|
Methodology and Processing |
|
|
Sources Statement |
|
|
Data Access |
|
|
Notes: |
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a> |
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
|
Related Publications |
|
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14-29. |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14-29. |
|
Label: |
Allstudies.mtmm.032804.sas |
|
Text: |
Combined studies analysis script |
|
Notes: |
text/x-sas-syntax; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
allstudies.mtmm.output.032804.lst |
|
Text: |
Combined studies analysis output |
|
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
Diss1.mtmm.032804.sas |
|
Text: |
Sub study 1 preparatory analysis script |
|
Notes: |
text/x-sas-syntax; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
Diss3.mtmm.032804.sas |
|
Text: |
Sub study 2 preparatory analysis script |
|
Notes: |
text/x-sas-syntax; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
Diss4.mtmm.032804.sas |
|
Text: |
Sub study 3 preparatory analysis script |
|
Notes: |
text/x-sas-syntax; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
Diss5.mtmm.032804.sas |
|
Text: |
Sub study 4 preparatory analysis script |
|
Notes: |
text/x-sas-syntax; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
NS2007.exppsy.pdf |
|
Text: |
Published article in Experimental Psychology |
|
Notes: |
application/pdf |
|
Label: |
NS2007.Study2.summarydatafile.zip |
|
Text: |
Combined studies summary datafile |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
NS2007.sub1.data.zip |
|
Text: |
Raw data for sub study 1 |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
NS2007.sub2.data.zip |
|
Text: |
Raw data for sub study 2 |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
NS2007.sub3.data.zip |
|
Text: |
Raw data for sub study 3 |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
NS2007.sub4.data.zip |
|
Text: |
Raw data for sub study 4 |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
ns2007.supplement.materials.zip |
|
Text: |
Supplemental analysis materials to article |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
ns2007.supplement.pdf |
|
Text: |
Supplement to article: Evidence for the generalizability of distinct implicit and explicit attitude constructs via a latent variable renanalysis of Nosek (2005) |
|
Notes: |
application/pdf |
|
Label: |
study1.mtmm.output.032804.lst |
|
Text: |
Sub study 1 analysis output |
|
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
study2.mtmm.output.032804.lst |
|
Text: |
Sub study 2 analysis output |
|
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
study3.mtmm.output.032804.lst |
|
Text: |
Sub study 3 analysis output |
|
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
|
Label: |
study4.mtmm.output.032804.lst |
|
Text: |
Sub study 4 analysis output |
|
Notes: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |