Replication Data for: "Using citizen voice to evaluate experiments on politicians: a UK survey experiment" (doi:10.7910/DVN/UDFLIA)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 3: Data Files Description
Part 4: Variable Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: "Using citizen voice to evaluate experiments on politicians: a UK survey experiment"

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/UDFLIA

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2022-12-12

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

John, Peter; Kim, Kristina; Soto, Luis, 2022, "Replication Data for: "Using citizen voice to evaluate experiments on politicians: a UK survey experiment"", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UDFLIA, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:0KjUP5zqeJrj6Qi1AnhpTg== [fileUNF]

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: "Using citizen voice to evaluate experiments on politicians: a UK survey experiment"

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/UDFLIA

Authoring Entity:

John, Peter (King's College London)

Kim, Kristina (University of Edinburgh)

Soto, Luis (King's College London)

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

John, Peter

Depositor:

Soto Tamayo, Luis Fernando

Date of Deposit:

2022-11-28

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UDFLIA

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, Survey experiment, Debriefing

Abstract:

Experiments on the responsiveness of elected officials highlight the tension between the freedom to carry out research and the right of subjects to be treated with respect. Controversy emerges from the power of politicians to block or object to experimental designs using identity deception. One way to resolve this conundrum is to consult citizens who, as constituents of politicians, have an interest in promoting the accountability of elected representatives. Building on the work of Desposato (2018) and Naurin and Öhberg (2021), this survey experiment presented research designs to UK citizens for their evaluation. The findings show that citizens strongly approve of experimental research on MPs and are glad to see their representatives participate. There are no differences in support whether designs use deception, debriefing, confederates, or pre-agreement from MPs. Linked to high interest in politics, more citizens are glad their MPs participate in studies with deception than those using confederates.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

File Description--f6767325

File: Deltapoll_PeterJohn220114-final2.tab

  • Number of cases: 8040

  • No. of variables per record: 40

  • Type of File: text/tab-separated-values

Notes:

UNF:6:0KjUP5zqeJrj6Qi1AnhpTg==

Variable Description

List of Variables:
  • id - Unique Indentifier
  • Gender - Which of the following best describes how you think of yourself?
  • Age - And how old are you?
  • Region - Where do you live?
  • SocGrade - Social Grade
  • Vote2019 - Past Vote in General Election 2019
  • VoteIntFull - Voting Intention (Full List of Parties)
  • Scenario - Scenario Shown
  • PJ1 - PJ1 How interested would you say you are in politics? Would you say you are:
  • PJ2_1 - PJ2_1 Politicians don't care what people like me think: I'd like to read you a f
  • PJ2_2 - PJ2_2 It is often difficult for me to understand what is going on: I'd like to r
  • PJ2_3 - PJ2_3 People like me have no say in what government does: I'd like to read you a
  • PJ2_4 - PJ2_4 The main political parties in Britain are pretty much all the same: I'd li
  • PJ2_5 - PJ2_5 UK parties/politicians fight each other rather than further public interes
  • PJ2_6 - PJ2_6 Politicians ignore the issues I really care about: I'd like to read you a
  • PJ3_1 - PJ3_1 Strongly Disagree|Strongly Agree: Using the following scale where 1 means
  • PJ4 - PJ4 Suppose you learned that a study like the one described before had been carr
  • PJ5_1 - PJ5_1 Very Likely|Not At All Likely: Using the following scale where 1 means 'Ve
  • PJ6_1 - PJ6_1 Researcher e-mailing pretending to be a local resident - (From what you re
  • PJ6_2 - PJ6_2 Telling the MPs afterwards that they were part of a study and they could w
  • PJ6_3 - PJ6_3 Researcher recruiting local residents to be part of the study to send the
  • PJ6_4 - PJ6_4 The MPs agree to the study being carried out beforehand - (From what you r
  • PJ6_5 - PJ6_5 MPs complain about the study - (From what you remember, which of the follo
  • PJ6_6 - PJ6_6 A journalist poses as a local resident - (From what you remember, which of
  • PJ6_7 - PJ6_7 None of the above - (From what you remember, which of the following were i
  • PJ6_8 - PJ6_8 Don't know - (From what you remember, which of the following were in the s
  • PJ7_1 - PJ7_1 : In more than 10 words tell us how you feel about this study?
  • PJ9_1 - PJ9_1 Highly Worthwhile|Not At All Worthwhile: Using the following scale where 1
  • PJx1 - PJx1 To which of these groups do you consider you belong?
  • PJx2 - PJx2 What is the highest educational or work-related qualification you have?
  • PJx3 - PJx3 Gross HOUSEHOLD income is the combined income of all those earners in a hou
  • PJx4a - PJx4a Do you consider yourself as belonging to a church, denomination, or a reli
  • PJx4b - PJx4b Which one?
  • PJx4b_8_Other - PJx4b_8_Other Which one?
  • w8 - Standard Nat-Rep Weight Variable
  • constituency - Constituency
  • constituencycode - ConstituencyCode
  • party - Party
  • const_party - Party
  • copartisan

Variables

Unique Indentifier

f6767325 Location:

Summary Statistics: Max. 5.4464615E7; Min. 5.4134311E7; StDev 70165.22825788267; Valid 8040.0; Mean 5.4203619065049745E7

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:QnQQZ+83OVssOmtLjY/Cig==

Which of the following best describes how you think of yourself?

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Male

3950

2.

Female

4063

3.

In another way

19

4.

Prefer not to answer

8

Summary Statistics: Max. 4.0; Valid 8040.0; Min. 1.0; StDev 0.5104491839225841; Mean 1.5130597014925358;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:xLPahxx8iNTvH5H6GNfQaw==

And how old are you?

f6767325 Location:

Summary Statistics: Mean 46.8807213930348; Min. 18.0; Max. 99.0; Valid 8040.0; StDev 17.2350434783019

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:1ljjN4BPGZ4ucRTRQuB5sA==

Where do you live?

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

9.

South-West

709

7.

West Midlands

715

6.

Wales

406

8.

East Midlands

589

3.

North-West

910

4.

North-East

349

11.

Eastern

677

1.

Northern Ireland

160

2.

Scotland

649

12.

London

1025

10.

South-East

1148

5.

Yorkshire & Humberside

703

Summary Statistics: Max. 12.0; StDev 3.3882583663424053; Mean 7.320895522388061; Valid 8040.0; Min. 1.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:K1E36GhEK6PsOlSAfznkqA==

Social Grade

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AB

2313

4.

DE

2908

2.

C1

1698

3.

C2

1121

Summary Statistics: Valid 8040.0; StDev 1.2422980721289294; Mean 2.575124378109453; Min. 1.0; Max. 4.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:nN0S8eiV+LeZuL3zrFAM5Q==

Past Vote in General Election 2019

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Conservative

2590

8.

DNV

223

5.

BXP / UKIP

189

9.

DK/Ref

85

4.

SNP

251

2.

Labour

2130

7.

Others

117

3.

Lib Dem

484

6.

Green Party

204

Summary Statistics: Max. 9.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 2.3661724852542623; StDev 1.9282366525477828; Valid 6273.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:WICvRQU5bA/0t/96aD0hWA==

Voting Intention (Full List of Parties)

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

2.

Labour

2679

3.

Lib Dem

492

7.

Plaid Cymru

53

11.

DK/Ref

1175

8.

Green Party

403

1.

Conservative

1966

4.

UK Independence Party (UKIP)

183

6.

SNP

291

9.

Others

189

5.

Reform UK

193

10.

WNV

416

Summary Statistics: Valid 8040.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 4.306467661691549; StDev 3.7608716015813983; Max. 11.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:+CO209ujLxMx7qdlDlTdsQ==

Scenario Shown

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

5.

Scenario 5 (B2)

1151

6.

Scenario 6 (C)

1155

7.

Scenario 7 (D)

1145

4.

Scenario 4 (B1)

1147

2.

Scenario 2 (A2)

1148

3.

Scenario 3 (A3)

1147

1.

Scenario 1 (A1)

1147

Summary Statistics: StDev 1.9994395933841191; Max. 7.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 4.001492537313433; Valid 8040.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:ECnodDId05Si9MfzRjQaZw==

PJ1 How interested would you say you are in politics? Would you say you are:

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

2.

Fairly interested

4012

1.

Very interested

1648

4.

Not at all interested

714

3.

Not very interested

1645

5.

Don't know

21

Summary Statistics: Min. 1.0; StDev 0.8684178947421429; Valid 8040.0; Mean 2.1850746268656662; Max. 5.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:XFtU3Bjp7EAe4mMHsacKiw==

PJ2_1 Politicians don't care what people like me think: I'd like to read you a f

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

4.

Disagree

805

3.

Nether agree nor disagree

1544

6.

Don't know

74

2.

Agree

3297

1.

Strongly agree

2186

5.

Strongly disagree

134

Summary Statistics: Max. 6.0; Valid 8040.0; StDev 1.0577774317719673; Mean 2.2072139303482583; Min. 1.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:Imc6smS9bTlTMPhizmhSHw==

PJ2_2 It is often difficult for me to understand what is going on: I'd like to r

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

5.

Strongly disagree

774

1.

Strongly agree

848

4.

Disagree

1848

2.

Agree

2535

3.

Nether agree nor disagree

1998

6.

Don't know

37

Summary Statistics: Max. 6.0; Mean 2.90995024875622; Min. 1.0; Valid 8040.0; StDev 1.177113298873771

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:aiuFzTql6QFzTM9IkGoxqQ==

PJ2_3 People like me have no say in what government does: I'd like to read you a

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Strongly agree

1756

6.

Don't know

70

2.

Agree

3244

4.

Disagree

1149

5.

Strongly disagree

235

3.

Nether agree nor disagree

1586

Summary Statistics: Max. 6.0; Min. 1.0; StDev 1.113514917348537; Mean 2.3871890547263686; Valid 8040.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:XWj3oERE98NjjLH3y8gwiQ==

PJ2_4 The main political parties in Britain are pretty much all the same: I'd li

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Strongly agree

1332

4.

Disagree

1663

2.

Agree

2928

5.

Strongly disagree

459

6.

Don't know

86

3.

Nether agree nor disagree

1572

Summary Statistics: Min. 1.0; Valid 8040.0; Mean 2.6575870646766155; Max. 6.0; StDev 1.200527374529155

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:xm2Y8dWbyqdexjFnClJD+Q==

PJ2_5 UK parties/politicians fight each other rather than further public interes

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

6.

Don't know

92

4.

Disagree

408

3.

Nether agree nor disagree

1204

2.

Agree

3803

1.

Strongly agree

2441

5.

Strongly disagree

92

Summary Statistics: StDev 0.9704435925844598; Valid 8040.0; Max. 6.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 2.02773631840796;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:KEA/KAPUFJdSyaRUA4pCWg==

PJ2_6 Politicians ignore the issues I really care about: I'd like to read you a

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

2.

Agree

3193

3.

Nether agree nor disagree

1998

5.

Strongly disagree

132

1.

Strongly agree

1804

6.

Don't know

108

4.

Disagree

805

Summary Statistics: StDev 1.0625645513273125; Valid 8040.0; Max. 6.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 2.3273631840796023

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:VSl9dzmjI1gxFrwlvzn+Ag==

PJ3_1 Strongly Disagree|Strongly Agree: Using the following scale where 1 means

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

999.

Don't know

1020

Summary Statistics: StDev 330.70676329029845; Max. 999.0; Valid 8039.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 131.53999253638506;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:E+ZmX2saRU1nQQWU+w2UPw==

PJ4 Suppose you learned that a study like the one described before had been carr

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

4.

Don't know

466

1.

I would be glad my MP was in the study,

4703

2.

I would rather my MP was not in the study

881

3.

I would not care either way

1990

Summary Statistics: Mean 1.7784825870646757; Min. 1.0; StDev 1.007650637317694; Max. 4.0; Valid 8040.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:6yP69mwIGYjjKosojFkl3Q==

PJ5_1 Very Likely|Not At All Likely: Using the following scale where 1 means 'Ve

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

999.

Don't know

844

Summary Statistics: Min. 1.0; Max. 999.0; Mean 125.52459490740733; StDev 325.7892243423038; Valid 6912.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:16xehnGz14AKfPkP9ZCPTQ==

PJ6_1 Researcher e-mailing pretending to be a local resident - (From what you re

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

Not selected

5206

1.

Selected

2834

Summary Statistics: Mean 0.3524875621890549; Max. 1.0; Valid 8040.0; Min. 0.0; StDev 0.47777449941589534;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:j/qqNH9ANC7JxGZxtiNp9A==

PJ6_2 Telling the MPs afterwards that they were part of a study and they could w

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

Not selected

6237

1.

Selected

1803

Summary Statistics: Max. 1.0; StDev 0.4171158536021719; Min. 0.0; Valid 8040.0; Mean 0.2242537313432837;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:ohLSnx97vvot5ycfm1PEIA==

PJ6_3 Researcher recruiting local residents to be part of the study to send the

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Selected

1804

0.

Not selected

6236

Summary Statistics: Mean 0.22437810945273626; Valid 8040.0; Max. 1.0; Min. 0.0; StDev 0.4171980608610376;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:dRO/kc7dzovcnx37K8bRXg==

PJ6_4 The MPs agree to the study being carried out beforehand - (From what you r

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

Not selected

6765

1.

Selected

1275

Summary Statistics: Min. 0.0; Valid 8040.0; StDev 0.36530864859049866; Mean 0.15858208955223882; Max. 1.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:Nifpic0crRJLa2YlNaxdkw==

PJ6_5 MPs complain about the study - (From what you remember, which of the follo

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Selected

975

0.

Not selected

7065

Summary Statistics: StDev 0.3264595308981981; Valid 8040.0; Min. 0.0; Mean 0.1212686567164176; Max. 1.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:DL9hgp8FxdseVKZjqAmUcg==

PJ6_6 A journalist poses as a local resident - (From what you remember, which of

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

Not selected

6416

1.

Selected

1624

Summary Statistics: Max. 1.0; Min. 0.0; StDev 0.401509801328363; Mean 0.20199004975124352; Valid 8040.0;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:fkUaKfqP/12xvEMHYom0jA==

PJ6_7 None of the above - (From what you remember, which of the following were i

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

Not selected

7536

1.

Selected

504

Summary Statistics: Valid 8040.0; Max. 1.0; Mean 0.06268656716417915; Min. 0.0; StDev 0.24241342877448968

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:Z6XNH+uPp6eL+EPvnXGvEA==

PJ6_8 Don't know - (From what you remember, which of the following were in the s

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Selected

1046

0.

Not selected

6994

Summary Statistics: Max. 1.0; Min. 0.0; Valid 8040.0; Mean 0.13009950248756266; StDev 0.33643379736911544;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:cG1DlO/zVvXOMB/Ka9zP/Q==

PJ7_1 : In more than 10 words tell us how you feel about this study?

f6767325 Location:

Variable Format: character

Notes: UNF:6:yrjBybjlncTUxhA/Uqp59g==

PJ9_1 Highly Worthwhile|Not At All Worthwhile: Using the following scale where 1

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

999.

Don't know

843

Summary Statistics: Min. 1.0; StDev 305.0330192784151; Valid 8040.0; Max. 999.0; Mean 107.80186567164199;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:OLZe1VAA6f7DnRwtRud2mA==

PJx1 To which of these groups do you consider you belong?

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

White British

6653

13.

Any other black background

11

7.

Indian

158

5.

White and Asian

61

3.

White and Black Caribbean

63

16.

Prefer not to say

33

8.

Pakistani

138

15.

Other ethnic group

65

11.

Black Caribbean

92

12.

Black African

174

6.

Any other mixed background

39

10.

Any other Asian background

59

2.

Any other white background

332

14.

Chinese

44

9.

Bangladeshi

74

4.

White and Black African

44

Summary Statistics: Valid 8040.0; Min. 1.0; StDev 3.038915278705556; Max. 16.0; Mean 2.1205223880596984;

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:HBtQd8vgEuHsWiaQm3uDjQ==

PJx2 What is the highest educational or work-related qualification you have?

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

3.

Recognised trade apprenticeship completed

170

13.

Nursing qualification (e.g. SEN, SRN, SCM, RGN)

106

2.

Youth training certificate/skillseekers

55

4.

Clerical and commercial

118

16.

University or CNAA first degree (e.g. BA, B.Sc, B.Ed)

1644

14.

Teaching qualification (not degree)

119

6.

City & Guilds certificate - advanced

196

9.

CSE grade 1, GCE O level, GCSE, School Certificate

1378

10.

Scottish Ordinary/ Lower Certificate

41

19.

Don't know

53

12.

Scottish Higher Certificate

126

18.

Other technical, professional or higher qualification

489

8.

CSE grades 2-5

171

7.

ONC

47

11.

GCE A level or Higher Certificate

1428

20.

Prefer not to say

65

15.

University diploma

416

17.

University or CNAA higher degree (e.g. M.Sc, Ph.D)

658

5.

City & Guilds certificate

324

1.

No formal qualifications

436

Summary Statistics: Mean 11.683582089552237; StDev 4.8749894547403745; Max. 20.0; Min. 1.0; Valid 8040.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:DvyFBqrgv4T3bm4RosyTZw==

PJx3 Gross HOUSEHOLD income is the combined income of all those earners in a hou

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

7.

��30,000 to ��34,999 per year

754

6.

��25,000 to ��29,999 per year

748

4.

��15,000 to ��19,999 per year

731

9.

��40,000 to ��44,999 per year

511

10.

��45,000 to ��49,999 per year

412

5.

��20,000 to ��24,999 per year

904

14.

��100,000 to ��149,999 per year

153

1.

Under ��5,000 per year

243

8.

��35,000 to ��39,999 per year

633

16.

Don't know

54

11.

��50,000 to ��59,999 per year

570

17.

Prefer not to answer

325

12.

��60,000 to ��69,999 per year

349

13.

��70,000 to ��99,999 per year

448

3.

��10,000 to ��14,999 per year

701

15.

��150,000 and over

65

2.

��5,000 to ��9,999 per year

439

Summary Statistics: Max. 17.0; Mean 7.463308457711437; Min. 1.0; StDev 4.0065435964650495; Valid 8040.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:NYh0gq5Yp5QghHIpGxNQ5g==

PJx4a Do you consider yourself as belonging to a church, denomination, or a reli

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

2.

Yes

2421

1.

No

5483

3.

Don't know

136

Summary Statistics: Valid 8040.0; Mean 1.334950248756219; Max. 3.0; Min. 1.0; StDev 0.5065780724262039

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:QkKvGNZWP7p1rSqY3YMTEg==

PJx4b Which one?

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

10.

Prefer not to answer

93

7.

Hindu

44

3.

Eastern Orthodox

65

8.

Other [Please specify]

311

4.

Islamic

251

2.

Roman Catholic

589

9.

Do not know

56

6.

Buddhist

18

1.

Protestant

941

5.

Jewish

53

Summary Statistics: StDev 2.8640810012467903; Max. 10.0; Mean 3.271788517141678; Min. 1.0; Valid 2421.0

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:BN1lPSdE7h1mkOyn4ah4aQ==

PJx4b_8_Other Which one?

f6767325 Location:

Variable Format: character

Notes: UNF:6:CbuinPcbS69Xs8Y2ViK/Pg==

Standard Nat-Rep Weight Variable

f6767325 Location:

Summary Statistics: Mean 0.9999999999931896; Valid 8040.0; Min. 0.03184120059693903; StDev 1.2935400176210132; Max. 34.47157244541697

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:9dSugCvgJ0pqeCqttV0VGg==

Constituency

f6767325 Location:

Variable Format: character

Notes: UNF:6:UaRiGsvLbmHicsKWWrq88g==

ConstituencyCode

f6767325 Location:

Variable Format: character

Notes: UNF:6:kc8IrRj2PqRvLNCyPYygvg==

Party

f6767325 Location:

Variable Format: character

Notes: UNF:6:ZfiHiit0GWkuDfsr+BxGgw==

Party

f6767325 Location:

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

7.

Others

199

2.

Labour

2798

3.

Liberal Democrats

79

4.

Scottish National

552

6.

Green

29

1.

Conservative

4383

Summary Statistics: Max. 7.0; Valid 8040.0; Min. 1.0; Mean 1.7401741293532327; StDev 1.1994848873793058

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:NTQ6NS8SxYOSYzgoUTBQbg==

copartisan

f6767325 Location:

Summary Statistics: Min. 0.0; Valid 8040.0; Max. 1.0; Mean 0.38905472636815985; StDev 0.48756611193934085

Variable Format: numeric

Notes: UNF:6:/eOmpTy6HkEmk1txcAAKMw==

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

John et al_code(b).do

Text:

Code in Do file

Notes:

application/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

John et al_Logfile.docx

Text:

Log file

Notes:

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Read me.docx

Text:

Brief description

Notes:

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document