The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America (doi:10.7910/DVN/UR2OBV)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/UR2OBV

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2009-11-13

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Christopher Terranova, 2009, "The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UR2OBV, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/UR2OBV

Authoring Entity:

Christopher Terranova

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Distributor:

NYU Law Review

Date of Deposit:

2009-06-17

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UR2OBV

Study Scope

Abstract:

<p>In America’s early history, state legislatures often formally instructed their federal representatives on particular votes. This practice flourished for a century, but then died out—a change that many scholars attribute to the Seventeenth Amendment. This Note argues that previous scholars have ignored other, more important reasons for the demise of instructions.</p> <br /> <p>The six-year term length for United States senators, combined with the increasingly rapid turnover in state legislat ures, prevented binding instructions from becoming entrenched. Instructions were held in place only by constitutional culture, but even this did not last. After Southern Democrats vigorously used the practice to purge Whigs from the Senate, instructions were indelibly linked to the South. Not surprisingly, the doctrine of instructions was one of the casualties of the Civil War. The roles had been reversed: Now the states—especially the Southern states—were taking instructions from the federal government. Today, instructions still exist, but as nonbinding “requests” for action. This new conception of instructions returns us full circle, to James Madison’s conception of the proper role of instructions: A right of “the people . . . to express and communicate their wishes” to their representatives. </p>

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. (forthcoming November 2009)

Bibliographic Citation:

84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. (forthcoming November 2009)

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Codebook - Terranova Instructions.pdf

Text:

Describes the data.

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Terranova.Appendix.pdf

Text:

Describes Data Collection Methodology

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

TerranovaDataverseExcel.xls

Text:

Data - Excel Format

Notes:

application/vnd.ms-excel