Replication Data for: When Can We Trust Regression Discontinuity Design Estimates from Close Elections? Evidence from Experimental Benchmarks (doi:10.7910/DVN/XDVIBG)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: When Can We Trust Regression Discontinuity Design Estimates from Close Elections? Evidence from Experimental Benchmarks

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/XDVIBG

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2024-10-24

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

De Magalhes, Leandro; Hangartner, Dominik; Hirvonen, Salomo; Meriläinen, Jaakko; Ruiz, Nelson A.; Tukiainen, Janne, 2024, "Replication Data for: When Can We Trust Regression Discontinuity Design Estimates from Close Elections? Evidence from Experimental Benchmarks", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XDVIBG, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: When Can We Trust Regression Discontinuity Design Estimates from Close Elections? Evidence from Experimental Benchmarks

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/XDVIBG

Authoring Entity:

De Magalhes, Leandro (University of Bristol)

Hangartner, Dominik (ETH Zurich)

Hirvonen, Salomo (University of Turku)

Meriläinen, Jaakko (Stockholm School of Economics)

Ruiz, Nelson A. (University of Essex)

Tukiainen, Janne (University of Turku)

Producer:

<i>Political Analysis</i>

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Hirvonen, Salomo

Depositor:

Hirvonen, Salomo

Date of Deposit:

2024-09-16

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XDVIBG

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences

Abstract:

Replication Data for: When Can We Trust Regression Discontinuity Design Estimates from Close Elections? Evidence from Experimental Benchmarks Regression discontinuity designs (RDD) are widely used in the social sciences to estimate causal effects from observational data. Scholars can choose from a range of methods that implement different RDD estimators, but there is a paucity of research on the performance of these different estimators in recovering experimental benchmarks. Leveraging exact ties in local elections in Colombia and Finland, which are resolved by random coin toss, we find that RDD estimation using bias-correction and robust inference (CCT) performs better in replicating experimental estimates of the individual incumbency advantage than local linear regression with conventional inference (LLR). We assess the generalizability of our results by estimating incumbency effects across different subsamples and in other countries. We find that CCT consistently comes closer to the experimental benchmark, produces smaller estimates than LLR, and that incumbency effects are highly heterogeneous, both in magnitude and sign, across countries with similar open-list PR systems.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Forthcoming, Political Analysis

Bibliographic Citation:

Forthcoming, Political Analysis

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

log_De_Magalhaes_et_al.smcl

Text:

Log-file

Notes:

application/x-stata-smcl

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

readme.rtf

Text:

README

Notes:

application/msword

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_1.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA2.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

FIgure_OA3.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA4.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA5.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA6.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA7.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Master.do

Text:

Master do-file

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_1.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA10.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA11.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA12.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA13.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA14.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA15.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA2.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA3.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA4.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA5.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA6.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA7.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA8.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA9.do

Notes:

text/x-stata-syntax

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

personal_incumbency_advantage.dta

Notes:

application/x-stata

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_1A.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_1B.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA2A.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA2B.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA3.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Figure_OA4.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA5A.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA5B.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA5C.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA5D.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA6A.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA6B.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA6C.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA6D.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

figure_OA7.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_1.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA10.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA11.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA12.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA13.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA14.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA2.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA3.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Table_OA4.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA5.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA6.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA7.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA8.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

table_OA9.tex

Notes:

application/x-tex

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

temp.txt

Notes:

text/plain