|
View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
|
Citation |
|
|---|---|
|
Title: |
Replication Data for: "Estimators for Topic-Sampling Designs" |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/YBV9Z8 |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Date of Distribution: |
2024-02-27 |
|
Version: |
1 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Rainey, Carlisle, 2024, "Replication Data for: "Estimators for Topic-Sampling Designs"", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YBV9Z8, Harvard Dataverse, V1 |
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Replication Data for: "Estimators for Topic-Sampling Designs" |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/YBV9Z8 |
|
Authoring Entity: |
Rainey, Carlisle (Florida State University) |
|
Producer: |
<i>Political Analysis</i> |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Access Authority: |
Rainey, Carlisle |
|
Depositor: |
Rainey, Carlisle |
|
Date of Deposit: |
2024-01-31 |
|
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YBV9Z8 |
|
Study Scope |
|
|
Keywords: |
Social Sciences |
|
Abstract: |
When researchers design an experiment, they usually hold potentially relevant features of the experiment constant. We call these details the “topic” of the experiment. For example, researchers studying the impact of party cues on attitudes must inform respondents of the parties’ positions on a particular policy. In doing so, researchers implement just one of many possible designs. Clifford, Leeper, and Rainey (2023) argue that researchers should implement many of the possible designs in parallel—what they call “topic sampling”—to generalize to a larger population of topics. We describe two estimators for topic-sampling designs. First, we describe a nonparametric estimator of the typical effect that is unbiased under the assumptions of the design. Second, we describe a hierarchical model that researchers can use to describe the heterogeneity. We suggest describing the heterogeneity across topics in three ways: (1) the standard deviation in treatment effects across topics, (2) the treatment effects for particular topics, and (3) how the treatment effects for particular topics vary with topic-level predictors. We evaluate the performance of the hierarchical model using the Strengthening Democracy Challenge megastudy and show that the hierarchical model works well. |
|
Methodology and Processing |
|
|
Sources Statement |
|
|
Data Access |
|
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
|
Related Publications |
|
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Forthcoming, Political Analysis |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Forthcoming, Political Analysis |
|
Label: |
estimators.zip |
|
Text: |
zipped reproduction archive |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |
|
Label: |
README.pdf |
|
Text: |
README |
|
Notes: |
application/pdf |