Aeration Basin Biomass Comparison Data (doi:10.7910/DVN/YGYW6S)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Aeration Basin Biomass Comparison Data

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/YGYW6S

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2023-04-05

Version:

2

Bibliographic Citation:

Ramey, Wayne; Wolf, Dan; Mastin, Natalie; Cath, Tzahi Y.; Hering, Amanda S., 2023, "Aeration Basin Biomass Comparison Data", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YGYW6S, Harvard Dataverse, V2

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Aeration Basin Biomass Comparison Data

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/YGYW6S

Authoring Entity:

Ramey, Wayne (Ramey Environmental Compliance, Inc.)

Wolf, Dan (Ramey Environmental Compliance, Inc.)

Mastin, Natalie (Baylor University)

Cath, Tzahi Y. (Colorado School of Mines)

Hering, Amanda S. (Baylor University)

Grant Number:

HDR:DSC 1924146

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Hering, Amanda S.

Depositor:

Mastin, Natalie

Date of Deposit:

2023-04-01

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YGYW6S

Study Scope

Keywords:

Earth and Environmental Sciences, Mathematical Sciences

Abstract:

A dataset that comes from the Rock Creek wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), which is a conventional treatment plant that has two aeration basins named East and West. To adjust operation, the total mass of biosolids in the system (activated sludge basin) is measured and compared to a target. If the amount of solids is greater than the target, the solids are removed from the system by "wasting" (less biosolids from the bottom of a clarifier that treats the water after the aeration basin are returned to the aeration basin). If the amount of solids is less than the target, no solids are wasted (more biosolids from the bottom of the clarifier are returned to the aeration basin). In cases where the amount of solids is less than the target, it is possible that the microorganisms cannot grow fast enough. This is most likely due to low concentrations of food (measured as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in the influent). The total biomass in the system is also related to ammonia transformation/removal. A minimum "sludge age" (e.g., average time biomass grows in the system, solids retention time (SRT)) is needed to remove ammonia and nitrate, but if the biomass stays in the system too long, "bad" microorganisms can take over that compete with the "good" microorganisms for food. The goal of this dataset is to compare the performance of the two aeration basins.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Sources:

Wayne Ramey and Dan Wolf of Ramey Environmental Compliance, Inc. provided this data.

Data Access

Notes:

This dataset is to be published under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration_diagram.png

Text:

Process diagram

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration_online.csv

Text:

CSV file with online oxygen data

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration_overview.csv

Text:

CSV file with influent/effluent sample time and chemical measurements

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration_process_control.csv

Text:

CSV file with wasting, mass, flow, and mass balance measurements

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration.Rd

Text:

R documentation file

Notes:

application/octet-stream

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration.rda

Text:

R data object

Notes:

application/gzip

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

superior_aeration_Rd.rtf

Text:

Text file containing documentation and variable descriptions

Notes:

text/rtf