|
View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
|
Citation |
|
|---|---|
|
Title: |
Inter-rater reliability and content validity of measurement tool for portfolio assessments used in the Introduction to Clinical Medicine course at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine: a methodological study |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/ZNTIWJ |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Date of Distribution: |
2025-01-01 |
|
Version: |
1 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Dong-Mi Yoo; Jae Jin Han, 2025, "Inter-rater reliability and content validity of measurement tool for portfolio assessments used in the Introduction to Clinical Medicine course at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine: a methodological study", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZNTIWJ, Harvard Dataverse, V1 |
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Inter-rater reliability and content validity of measurement tool for portfolio assessments used in the Introduction to Clinical Medicine course at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine: a methodological study |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/ZNTIWJ |
|
Authoring Entity: |
Dong-Mi Yoo (Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) |
|
Jae Jin Han (Department of Medical Education & Thoracic Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine) |
|
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Access Authority: |
Dong-Mi Yoo |
|
Depositor: |
Cho, A Ra |
|
Date of Deposit: |
2024-12-02 |
|
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZNTIWJ |
|
Study Scope |
|
|
Keywords: |
Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
|
Abstract: |
This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of measurement tool for portfolio assessments in medical education. Specifically, it investigated scoring consistency among raters and assessment criteria appropriateness by the expert panel. A cross-sectional observational study was done from September to December 2018 for the Introduction to Clinical Medicine course at the Ewha Womans University College of Medicine. Data were collected for 5 randomly selected portfolios scored by a and 6 trained raters. An expert panel assessed the validity of 12 assessment items using the content validity index (CVI). Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation coefficients for rater alignment, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)for inter-rater reliability, and CVI for item-level validity. |
|
Methodology and Processing |
|
|
Sources Statement |
|
|
Data Access |
|
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
|
Label: |
Dataset 1. Research data for the inter-rater reliability of portfolio assessment..xlsx |
|
Notes: |
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
|
Label: |
Dataset 2. Research data for the inter-rater reliability of content validity..xlsx |
|
Notes: |
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
|
Label: |
Supplement 1. The criteria for “Introduction to Clinical Medicine” portfolio assessment.docx |
|
Notes: |
application/haansoftdocx |