Replication Data for: Flexible Estimation of Policy Preferences for Witnesses in Committee Hearings (doi:10.7910/DVN/ZU5QTG)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Flexible Estimation of Policy Preferences for Witnesses in Committee Hearings

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/ZU5QTG

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2024-04-01

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Esterling, Kevin; Park, Ju Yeon, 2024, "Replication Data for: Flexible Estimation of Policy Preferences for Witnesses in Committee Hearings", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZU5QTG, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Flexible Estimation of Policy Preferences for Witnesses in Committee Hearings

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/ZU5QTG

Authoring Entity:

Esterling, Kevin (UC Riverside)

Park, Ju Yeon (The Ohio State University)

Producer:

<i>Political Analysis</i>

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Esterling, Kevin

Depositor:

Esterling, Kevin

Date of Deposit:

2024-02-01

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZU5QTG

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences

Abstract:

Theoretical expectations regarding communication patterns between legislators and outside agents, such as lobbyists, agency officials or policy experts, often depend on the relationship between legislators' and agents' preferences. However, legislators and non-elected outside agents evaluate the merits of policies using distinct criteria and considerations. We develop a measurement method that flexibly estimates the policy preferences for a class of outside agents -- witnesses in committee hearings -- separate from that of legislators’ and compute their preference distance across the two dimensions. In our application to Medicare hearings, we find that legislators in the U.S. Congress heavily condition their questioning of witnesses on preference distance, showing that legislators tend to seek policy information from like-minded experts in committee hearings. We do not find this result using a conventional measurement placing both actors on one dimension. The contrast in results lends support for the construct validity of our proposed preference measures.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Forthcoming, Political Analysis

Bibliographic Citation:

Forthcoming, Political Analysis

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

README_FIRST.txt

Notes:

text/plain

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Replication_flex_zip.zip

Notes:

application/zip