Brian Nosek Dataverse

Featured Dataverses

In order to use this feature you must have at least one published or linked dataverse.

Publish Dataverse

Are you sure you want to publish your dataverse? Once you do so it must remain published.

Publish Dataverse

This dataverse cannot be published because the dataverse it is in has not been published.

Delete Dataverse

Are you sure you want to delete your dataverse? You cannot undelete this dataverse.

21 to 25 of 25 Results

Ranganath, Smith, & Nosek (2008): Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods May 2, 2009 Kate Ranganath, Colin Smith, & Brian Nosek, 2009, "Ranganath, Smith, & Nosek (2008): Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IOUSBB, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:3:zfYW+sfQjE05JUx5lp0ObQ== [fileUNF] Distinct automatic and controlled processes are presumed to influence social evaluation. Most empirical approaches examine automatic processes using indirect methods, and controlled processes using direct methods. We distinguished processes from measurement methods to test whether a process distinction is more useful than a measurement distinction...
Nosek et al. (2009): National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement May 2, 2009 Brian Nosek, Fred Smyth + 23 co-authors, 2009, "Nosek et al. (2009): National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KEKQK, Harvard Dataverse, V1 About 70% of more than half a million Implicit Association Tests (IATs) completed by citizens of 34 countries revealed expected implicit stereotypes associating science with male more than with female. We discovered that nation-level implicit stereotype predicted nation-level sex differences in 8th-grade science and mathematics achievement. Self-re...
Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me Jan 20, 2009 Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1PEUPZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1 We examined the role of group membership (being female or male), implicit identity with social groups (me=male/female), and math-gender stereotypes (math=male) in predicting implicit math attitudes (math=good) and math identity (math=me). In addition, we investigated the relationship between implicit and explicit preferences and SAT performance. Co...
Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Jan 20, 2009 Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN, Harvard Dataverse, V1 Recent theoretical and methodological innovations suggest a distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. We applied Campbell and Fiske’s (1959) classic multitrait-multimethod design precepts to test the construct validity of implicit attitudes as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Participants (N = 287) were measured on both...
Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task Jan 20, 2009 Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NTNKZZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1 Theory is constrained by the quality and versatility of measurement tools. As such, the development of techniques for measurement is critical to the successful development of theory. This paper presents a technique — the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT)—that joins a family of existing techniques for measuring implicit social cognition generally, wi...

Ranganath, Smith, & Nosek (2008): Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods

May 2, 2009

Kate Ranganath, Colin Smith, & Brian Nosek, 2009, "Ranganath, Smith, & Nosek (2008): Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IOUSBB, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:3:zfYW+sfQjE05JUx5lp0ObQ== [fileUNF]

Distinct automatic and controlled processes are presumed to influence social evaluation. Most empirical approaches examine automatic processes using indirect methods, and controlled processes using direct methods. We distinguished processes from measurement methods to test whether a process distinction is more useful than a measurement distinction...

Nosek et al. (2009): National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement

May 2, 2009

Brian Nosek, Fred Smyth + 23 co-authors, 2009, "Nosek et al. (2009): National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KEKQK, Harvard Dataverse, V1

About 70% of more than half a million Implicit Association Tests (IATs) completed by citizens of 34 countries revealed expected implicit stereotypes associating science with male more than with female. We discovered that nation-level implicit stereotype predicted nation-level sex differences in 8th-grade science and mathematics achievement. Self-re...

Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

Jan 20, 2009

Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1PEUPZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1

We examined the role of group membership (being female or male), implicit identity with social groups (me=male/female), and math-gender stereotypes (math=male) in predicting implicit math attitudes (math=good) and math identity (math=me). In addition, we investigated the relationship between implicit and explicit preferences and SAT performance. Co...

Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.

Jan 20, 2009

Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Recent theoretical and methodological innovations suggest a distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. We applied Campbell and Fiske’s (1959) classic multitrait-multimethod design precepts to test the construct validity of implicit attitudes as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Participants (N = 287) were measured on both...

Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task

Jan 20, 2009

Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NTNKZZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Theory is constrained by the quality and versatility of measurement tools. As such, the development of techniques for measurement is critical to the successful development of theory. This paper presents a technique — the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT)—that joins a family of existing techniques for measuring implicit social cognition generally, wi...

Add Data

Share Dataverse

Link Dataverse

Reset Modifications