The Legislative Studies Quarterly is an international journal devoted to the publication of research on representative assemblies. Its purpose is to disseminate scholarly work on parliaments and legislatures, their relations to other political institutions, their functions in the political system, and the activities of their members both within the institution and outside. The Quarterly invites contributions from scholars in all countries. Its pages are open to all research approaches consistent with the normal canons of scholarship, and to work on representative assemblies in all settings and all time periods. The aim of the Quarterly is to contribute to the formulation and verification of general theories about legislative systems, processes, and behavior. The editors encourage contributors to emphasize the cross-national implications of their findings, even if these findings are based on research within a single country. The Legislative Studies Quarterly is the official journal of the Legislative Studies Section of the American Political Science Association.
Featured Dataverses

In order to use this feature you must have at least one published or linked dataverse.

Publish Dataverse

Are you sure you want to publish your dataverse? Once you do so it must remain published.

Publish Dataverse

This dataverse cannot be published because the dataverse it is in has not been published.

Delete Dataverse

Are you sure you want to delete your dataverse? You cannot undelete this dataverse.

Advanced Search

141 to 150 of 165 Results
Aug 7, 2018
Tromborg, Mathias, 2018, "Replication Data for: Constituent demand and District-focused Legislative Representation", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X3ZNP8, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:8zo9xUeereeYj9hkMQGKFA== [fileUNF]
Replication Data for: "Constituent demand and District-focused Legislative Representation" published in LSQ
Jul 30, 2018 - Harvard Dataverse
Cox, Gary W; Akirav, Osnat, 2018, "Replication Data for: "The formateur's bonus in European constitutional monarchies, 1901-1999"", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BUEHYT, Harvard Dataverse, V2
The readme file and replication data for "The formateur's bonus in European constitutional monarchies, 1901-1999". In this paper, we examine bonuses garnered by government formateurs in all European democracies that began the 20th century as constitutional monarchies. Using a new dataset on how portfolios were allocated in each democratic coalition...
Jul 11, 2018 - Harvard Dataverse
Smith, Daniel M.; Martin, Shane, 2018, "Replication Data for: Political Dynasties and the Selection of Cabinet Ministers", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5Y5148, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:kRvVmcePgJ5C/M+T/Dkb1w== [fileUNF]
Replication data and Stata do-files for Smith, Daniel M., and Shane Martin. 2017. “Political Dynasties and the Selection of Cabinet Ministers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(1): 131-165.
Jan 3, 2018 - Harvard Dataverse
Holman, Mirya; Mahoney, Anna, 2018, "Replication Data for: Stop, Collaborate, and Listen: Women’s Collaboration in US State Legislatures", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YPV8CD, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Replication data for Stop, Collaborate, and Listen: Women’s Collaboration in US State Legislatures. Includes dataset of cosponsorship information for 140,000 pieces of state legislative data, a codebook, and a replication do file.
Aug 5, 2017 - Harvard Dataverse
Kriner, Douglas; Reeves, Andrew; Christenson, Dino, 2017, "Replication Data for: All the President’s Senators: Presidential Copartisans and the Allocation of Federal Grants", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PBWLAO, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Previous scholarship argues that House members’ partisan relationship to the president is among the most important determinants of the share of federal dollars they bring home to their constituents. Do presidential politics also shape distributive outcomes in the Senate? Analyzing the allocation of more than $8.5 trillion of federal grants across t...
Dec 21, 2016 - Harvard Dataverse
Thames, Frank; Meserve, Stephen; Robbins, Joseph, 2016, "Replication Data for: Multiple Principals and Legislative Cohesion", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1GHCOT, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Replication data for ``Multiple Principals and Legislative Cohesion.''
Aug 4, 2015 - Justin H. Kirkland Dataverse
Kirkland, Justin; Harden, Jeffrey, 2015, "Replication Data for: Representation, Competing Principals, and Waffling on Bills in U.S. Legislatures", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WN3EDC, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:GlkE2m/wU8VKh0PIWrktaQ== [fileUNF]
Legislators are often placed in the position of representing the interests of their constituents against the preferences of their own party leaders. We develop a theoretical framework indicating that these cross-pressured legislators are more likely to initially support legislation and subsequently change their minds than are legislators whose cons...
Mar 7, 2015 - Frank Thames Dataverse
Thames, Frank, 2015, "Replication data for: Electoral Rules and Legislative Parties in the Ukrainian Rada", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/29396, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Replication data for the LSQ article "Electoral Rules and Legislative Parties in the Ukrainian Rada."
Jan 27, 2015 - Jeffrey J. Harden Dataverse
Harden, Jeffrey J.; Kirkland, Justin H., 2015, "Replication data for: Do Campaign Donors Influence Polarization? Evidence from Public Financing in the American States", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/28868, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Does the source of campaign funds influence legislative polarization? We develop competing theoretical expectations regarding the effects of publicly-financed elections on legislative voting behavior. To test these expectations, we leverage a natural experiment in the New Jersey Assembly in which public financing was made available to a subset of m...
May 26, 2014 - L.J Zigerell Dataverse
Zigerell, L.J, 2014, "Replication data for: Senator Opposition to Supreme Court Nominations: Reference Dependence on the Departing Justice", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26222, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:5:4P+q8EZX/KwW/Jxdq0PzKw== [fileUNF]
Research indicates that senators evaluate U.S. Supreme Court nominations on two ideological dimensions: the distance between themselves and the nominee, and the potential effect confirmation would have on the Court median. My analysis of nominations from 1968 to 2006 provides evidence that senators are also influenced by the ideological contrast be...
Add Data

Sign up or log in to create a dataverse or add a dataset.

Share Dataverse

Share this dataverse on your favorite social media networks.

Link Dataverse
Reset Modifications

Are you sure you want to reset the selected metadata fields? If you do this, any customizations (hidden, required, optional) you have done will no longer appear.