1 to 3 of 3 Results
Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse
Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1PEUPZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1
We examined the role of group membership (being female or male), implicit identity with social groups (me=male/female), and math-gender stereotypes (math=male) in predicting implicit math attitudes (math=good) and math identity (math=me). In addition, we investigated the relationship between implicit and explicit preferences and SAT performance. Co... |
Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse
Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Recent theoretical and methodological innovations suggest a distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. We applied Campbell and Fiske’s (1959) classic multitrait-multimethod design precepts to test the construct validity of implicit attitudes as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Participants (N = 287) were measured on both... |
Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse
Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NTNKZZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Theory is constrained by the quality and versatility of measurement tools. As such, the development of techniques for measurement is critical to the successful development of theory. This paper presents a technique — the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT)—that joins a family of existing techniques for measuring implicit social cognition generally, wi... |