Project Implicit Dataverse

Featured Dataverses

In order to use this feature you must have at least one published or linked dataverse.

Publish Dataverse

Are you sure you want to publish your dataverse? Once you do so it must remain published.

Publish Dataverse

This dataverse cannot be published because the dataverse it is in has not been published.

Delete Dataverse

Are you sure you want to delete your dataverse? You cannot undelete this dataverse.

1 to 10 of 52 Results

Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1PEUPZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1 We examined the role of group membership (being female or male), implicit identity with social groups (me=male/female), and math-gender stereotypes (math=male) in predicting implicit math attitudes (math=good) and math identity (math=me). In addition, we investigated the relationship between implicit and explicit preferences and SAT performance. Co...
feelings about the Arts.doc Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me MS Word - 10.5 KB - MD5: be1d1e41d594a6b105f393d959a46b8b Sample attitude questionnaire from studies.
identificationmath.doc Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me MS Word - 29.5 KB - MD5: 0caf1f93752d1efdda5da965791eb936 Sample identity questionnaire from studies.
NBG2002.analyses.010901.sas Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me SAS Syntax - 14.3 KB - MD5: e683f589080f86aaca12defb7fd82073 Scripts SAS analysis script for some analyses on combined dataset
NBG2002.library.creator.all.sas Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me SAS Syntax - 28.4 KB - MD5: b297762b96b3cb7a87e280b403b7a1f6 Scripts SAS analysis script for importing data for all three studies
NBG2002.Study1.data.zip Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me ZIP Archive - 379.2 KB - MD5: 41f6384dc1021fef35f66ca607aff506 Data Raw data for Study 1
NBG2002.Study2.data.zip Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me ZIP Archive - 520.4 KB - MD5: 54e124719156cec36c7d392a675c207f Data Raw data for Study 2
NBG2002.Study3.data.zip Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me ZIP Archive - 546.0 KB - MD5: f9ca7a2fc818f36f514ce453a8c70081 Data Raw data for Study 3
nosekmath2002.pdf Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me Adobe PDF - 216.7 KB - MD5: b5c70cafc2355a3ee59665b434b6d095 Article published in JPSP
Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN, Harvard Dataverse, V1 Recent theoretical and methodological innovations suggest a distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. We applied Campbell and Fiske’s (1959) classic multitrait-multimethod design precepts to test the construct validity of implicit attitudes as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Participants (N = 287) were measured on both...

Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse

Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1PEUPZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1

We examined the role of group membership (being female or male), implicit identity with social groups (me=male/female), and math-gender stereotypes (math=male) in predicting implicit math attitudes (math=good) and math identity (math=me). In addition, we investigated the relationship between implicit and explicit preferences and SAT performance. Co...

feelings about the Arts.doc

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

MS Word - 10.5 KB -

Sample attitude questionnaire from studies.

identificationmath.doc

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

MS Word - 29.5 KB -

Sample identity questionnaire from studies.

NBG2002.analyses.010901.sas

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

SAS Syntax - 14.3 KB -

Scripts

SAS analysis script for some analyses on combined dataset

NBG2002.library.creator.all.sas

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

SAS Syntax - 28.4 KB -

Scripts

SAS analysis script for importing data for all three studies

NBG2002.Study1.data.zip

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

ZIP Archive - 379.2 KB -

Data

Raw data for Study 1

NBG2002.Study2.data.zip

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

ZIP Archive - 520.4 KB -

Data

Raw data for Study 2

NBG2002.Study3.data.zip

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

ZIP Archive - 546.0 KB -

Data

Raw data for Study 3

nosekmath2002.pdf

Jan 20, 2009 - Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald (2002): Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ^= Me

Adobe PDF - 216.7 KB -

Article published in JPSP

Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.

Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse

Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Smyth (2007): A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/U7SVHN, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Recent theoretical and methodological innovations suggest a distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. We applied Campbell and Fiske’s (1959) classic multitrait-multimethod design precepts to test the construct validity of implicit attitudes as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Participants (N = 287) were measured on both...

Add Data

Share Dataverse

Link Dataverse

Reset Modifications