21 to 30 of 52 Results
ZIP Archive - 248.7 KB -
MD5: fb6258020ef50ef7e4c274db3632b321
Raw data for sub study 3 |
ZIP Archive - 250.5 KB -
MD5: ea3d16e5495b94670f4d8e5438ab3e56
Raw data for sub study 4 |
ZIP Archive - 234.0 KB -
MD5: b0f77419a8204ace3ebe6d78b49dd005
Supplemental analysis materials to article |
Adobe PDF - 188.6 KB -
MD5: 84e8d1ca8f1143440cc8517ca4592b18
Supplement to article: Evidence for the generalizability of distinct implicit and explicit attitude constructs via a latent variable renanalysis of Nosek (2005) |
Plain Text - 12.0 KB -
MD5: b4286e44cd51d615838f157ea12fd8d2
Sub study 1 analysis output |
Plain Text - 18.3 KB -
MD5: 0bd599afba104078d178e4846564beee
Sub study 2 analysis output |
Plain Text - 9.4 KB -
MD5: a8de2d5abd2ea29370916af61373642c
Sub study 3 analysis output |
Plain Text - 7.8 KB -
MD5: 3c9cd1fbe43ca7200eb3fe3a39d16d9e
Sub study 4 analysis output |
Jan 20, 2009 - Brian Nosek Dataverse
Brian Nosek, 2009, "Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NTNKZZ, Harvard Dataverse, V1
Theory is constrained by the quality and versatility of measurement tools. As such, the development of techniques for measurement is critical to the successful development of theory. This paper presents a technique — the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT)—that joins a family of existing techniques for measuring implicit social cognition generally, wi... |
Jan 20, 2009 -
Nosek & Banaji (2001): The Go/No-Go Association Task
MS Word - 33.5 KB -
MD5: 08cda5a5069057e501785fd7efbb7f18
Questionnaire for Experiment 6 |